This week marks the annual New Partners for Smart Growth conference, which will be held in Kansas City, Missouri. The occasion of this conference, my last two+ years of being away, and some recent visits, have given me time to reflect. Today’s post is the result.

If you’re a Kansas Citian, I hope you to read this as “questioning and critiquing from someone that cares.” Chuck Marohn wrote a critical, but largely accurate piece at Strong Towns last year that I felt merited far too many defensive responses from the locals. No person or place can ever improve without an honest assessment of their strengths and flaws. It’s difficult and often painful work to do so, but truly the only way to progress.

For those of you in the rest of the world, I hope this gives some food-for-thought on your own city, and what the future may hold.


For most of my adult life I lived in Kansas City, and for most of my life before that my family considered it home. Even though life took us to Minnesota, Oklahoma, Nebraska and mid-Missouri, we always looked at KC as home. Following college, I lived for 17 years in Midtown KC, including 10 where I ran a business. My time there included a Presidency of AIA-KC, board membership on numerous civic groups, and even a mention by the Pitch in the “Best of KC” issue.

So you could say I know the area well, and have given much time, energy and thought to its current condition and future. I’ve advocated as best I knew how, which by my own admission has had mixed results. Sometimes my urgings were tactful and well received; sometimes they were less-tactful rants that were duly ignored. Often I was given a polite platform to express my views and lead discussion, but was personally frustrated by the slow pace of change.

My issues have always been wrapped up in KC’s wholesale acquiescence to the car culture. That mindset runs completely counter to how I wish to live, and what an increasing number of people are looking for in a community. It’s not that I’m anti-car. I’ve owned a car continuously since I was 16 years old. But what I don’t want is to be held hostage by that car. I prefer to live somewhere that allows me to live a rich and full life primarily by walking, biking and using public transportation.

Like a lot of people in my generation, I grew up with suburbia. Even when we lived in small towns, we lived in the newer, suburban-style section of town. While that was what I knew, I also felt there was something about it which I didn’t enjoy. It was only when I was able to travel as a young adult that I fully understood what it was that I was missing. It’s a tired cliché, but a couple of trips to Europe, and a few books and magazines later, and I knew that what I most disliked was the complete reliance on the car that we have in most of the US. And nowhere is that more true than in the Midwest.

In the book Nine Nations of North America, Joel Garreau brilliantly analyzed the cultures and geography of the continent in ways no one had been able to articulate previously. He labeled much of the heart of the US as the “Breadbasket” with KC as its capital. I’ve always felt he really nailed it.

360px Ninenations 300x236

As the capital of the Breadbasket (or just what I like to call the Midwest), KC is also, in my opinion, the capital of the car culture in America. There’s really no disputing its status, even though in pop culture we tend to think of the NASCAR-loving South, the wide-open spaces of Texas or the freeways of southern California. If you need some convincing, here are a few nuggets for you:

  • KC has the highest number of freeway lane miles per capita of any city in the world. St. Louis is 2nd, but KC has 20% more than St. Louis even.
  • The region continues to plan for more freeways. A proposed western outer loop is again being seriously considered by the region’s planners, as is a long-sought highway along the Missouri River east of downtown to Independence
  • While there is still peak-hour congestion in some areas, the metro area consistently ranks as the least-congested of any major metro in North America.
  • Johnson County, KS, the second most populous county in the region, is set to eliminate all bus service since there’s no local source of funding.
  • All civic amenities, including the airport, all of the professional sports stadiums, the zoo, botanical gardens and more have been spread across the region, instead of concentrated into one or a few locations. All of them are drive-up, drive-off destinations. The biggest pastime for football and baseball games is tailgating in the enormous parking lots. The airport is unique in large cities, in that it is a drive-up to the gate design.
  • The downtown freeway loop is perhaps the tightest such loop in the country, effectively turning downtown into a single exit off of the freeway.
  • Parking is free even in the most densely populated destinations, such as Country Club Plaza. Even in downtown, parking is as cheaply priced as any large city in the country.
  • All redevelopment in the urban core, even in downtown, has typically accommodated suburban amounts of parking as an expectation.

Of course, like many cities in the US, it wasn’t always this way. At one time, KC was a densely populated, vibrant city with one of the largest streetcar systems in the country. Downtown was a lively mix of shopping, businesses and residents that was everything we aspire to today when we talk about walkability.

kc streetcar system 300x250

My own hope over many years has been to see KC reclaim the urbanity it used to have a couple of generations ago, when it was the subject of popular songs.  That urbanity would be the magnet that would attract and keep those people who, like myself, want an excellent option for a walkable lifestyle.

KC has always had great potential to do this, because of the skeleton left by previous generations. But when it has come time to make a choice, the city has always chosen the car culture instead. I talked about this very notion when I wrote a piece called, “Does KC really want to be a city?” back in 2003 for the Kansas City Star in their Midwest Voices column.

The city does have some truly great moments of urbanity. The Plaza is beautiful, and mostly a good place for walking. From Brookside to Westport to Crossroads and Downtown, the spine of the city has some attractive buildings, a few nice parks, and a slew of great restaurants, coffee shops, businesses etc. And, that spine is a far better place now than it was in 1993, when I first moved in to Midtown.

But the problem remains that there is no critical mass anywhere that even approaches a complete, walkable neighborhood or two. The destinations are spread so far that even dedicated walkers eventually become drivers. And let’s face it, driving and parking even in the urban core is very easy.

The question for KC is really – what does the future hold? As a former longtime resident, I was always part of the discussion asking, “what distinguishes KC?” What does KC have that no one else does, and how can the city market that?

The reality is, the most defining element of KC is that it is Car City, USA. It’s an exceptionally easy place to drive around and find parking. As a result, it’s the least-densely populated major city in the country.

A legitimate question to ask is: is this a problem or an asset? Should the region and city double-down on the car culture, or should it aggressively try to change this? If the idea is to make change, it needs to be understood why, what the results will be, and what the financial implications are.

I have maintained for my entire career that KC needs to change, and needs to change aggressively. My position is that the future demands it. The combination of demographic and generational changes, peak oil concerns and climate change all will shape our cities in ways that we cannot imagine today. But what we can conclude by looking at all of these issues is that the future will not wait for cities that are spread-out to the hinterlands. In a back-to-the-future world, the 21st century city will be a place for walking, biking and public transportation.

KC could stake a claim for this future easier than some places, because of what remnants are still left from the 19th and early 20th centuries. The larger downtown/crossroads areas, and Westport/Plaza should be the economic incubators and engines of the next generation. Those two areas are large enough and compact enough to be complete places to live, work and play. At a bare minimum, everything should be done to make that a reality, and quickly.

But then, this is the viewpoint through my lens. Many others, especially those civic leaders who’ve been guiding the city for 30, 40 years or more would disagree with me. They might be in the camp that we should double-down on the car culture, because that is what people really want, it’s what the region has invested in, and those future warnings are nothing but siren songs.

I will admit: they could be right. I could be wrong.

I doubt it, but it’s possible.

Regardless, I’m no longer a KC resident, so this is really about what current and future residents and leaders will work towards. For years, city leaders have ignored the pleas and haranguing of those who care most about the city. Whether it’s the Urban Society, the Downtown Neighborhood Association, the Urban Core Group or many others before them, it’s been a consistent struggle to work against the car culture. At virtually every turn, civic and business leaders have chosen to suburbanize the city ever more.

But this question about the car culture is THE central question for the region’s future. There’s simply not enough money to simultaneously invest in freeways and a real public transportation system. The two systems do not co-exist. To build a real walking and biking city will require making choices that do in fact make driving and parking somewhat painful. Future regional projects such as the airport, the stadiums and more will have to be looked at through different lenses. Transitioning from one system to the other will be difficult for a lot of people and companies, and some will leave. Many will question the decisions, as happened when the city ripped out its previous infrastructure to become the car city it is now.

All cities across America, and to some extent the entire world, are facing these choices. The issues of today are not those of 1950. And yet, no city faces a more difficult look at these choices than KC. Split equally between two states, politically divided (some would also argue culturally) and spread out geographically like none other, the task seems daunting. What is the future of Car City, USA?

Be Sociable, Share!
  • more

11 Responses to Kansas City: Car City, USA

  1. I don’t think you’re wrong, but I think you’ve applied a regional lens without pulling the progress downtown out of the greater picture. What I’m seeing is a more pronounced divergence, where Johnson County is gutting transit and downtown is building a streetcar. There is a growing culture for walkability in specific areas, even if the broader community is on the wrong side of progress. Johnson County might as well be 1,000 miles away for as much as it is part of my daily reality.

    Still, we’re fighting an uphill fight because we need to attract those folks, but I think that is true for everywhere. I still think our urban pockets do a better job than Houston, Charlotte, and other cities built mostly in the car era. We still have enough of our dense guts to build something out of, and our lousy density numbers are mostly a result of having actual cornfields within the city limits as the annexation race for suburbia waged in decades past.

    Finally, we’ve got our first real urban-minder leader in Mayor James. That does make a difference when setting a vision, and we’re screaming a vision for a more dynamic urban city.

    That isn’t necessarily happening in Midtown, but it doesn’t have to for us to start showing the way.

  2. Kevin Klinkenberg says:

    Well said, Matt. Keep fighting the good fight.

  3. James Rice says:

    I’m bullish on Midtown, and am proud of what Downtown is doing. Several weeks ago, at the public meeting for the Midtown Area Plan that the city is working on I heard a steady refrain of people desiring more density, preservation of what we have and a disdain of encroaching car culture that has already been so destructive to parts of Midtown. There’s enough muscle left on those old bones you mentioned to pull things together and grow strong again.

  4. Rich Caplan says:

    Appreciated your thoughts Kevin. Just a note to add that I have been a resident of Brookside/Armour Fields for the last 8 years and moved from a suburban house. While I appreciate Johnson County, we love to walk to Brookside every weekend for dinner and/or breakfast, as well as nearby Waldo. Though the trolley is gone, the trolley trail is wonderful and always busy with mothers, jogggers, or aging boomers like my wife and I.

  5. Danny P says:

    Hmmm, well as an urban planner and Architect i find myself at odds with the latest crazes on most fronts. I try find a balance. Sure, i must say i do respect your opinion Kevin, as i know you do practice what you preach. I will say though as with most things in life, its not a matter of either/or, but rather a balance of both ideals. I agree more folks need to walk, ride bikes and stop driving so damn much on wasted trips, combine their trips. I also would agree that on the other front i see in most urban environments the dwellers of such are either young with no kids, or older and retired ( no kids) I see that here in KC if one wants to have a job, chances are that job offer will not come from their neighborhood, supports services such as a good school district for your children will only be offered in a suburb. I could go on but wont’t. I will say to those that do and need cars, please stop making endless trips to the convenience store to just get a soft drink.

  6. J Holland says:

    Kevin, You only briefly touch on the region’s greatest liability, the State Line. No metro area in this nation of 50 states has its economic base so evenly divided between two states. The State Line prevents regional land use planning, frusrates development of public transit, assures sprawl and has lead to job poaching and tax incentives that impede the region from competing effectively with other metro areas. In addition the urban core ends up assuming the primary financial responsibility for funding regional amenities, thus requring planning compromises that work against density. Would that there were actually Nine Nations of North America and Kansas City was the capital of the Breadbasket…but until we address the fundamental issues of Bi-State cooperation and shared financial responsibility, this divided metro’s car centric recent past is likely to be its future.

  7. Danny P says:

    I would agree with J Holland’s assessment. The state line issue creates an institutional and fundamental divide.

  8. Thanks Kevin for framing these issues in a productive way. There is lots to chew on as other commenters have suggested. One other topic that I would encourage you to explore in a follow-up post is the adaptability of our places, and what connection adaptability has to transportation systems. Does the car culture make KC more fragile or more adaptable than other major cities? Nassim Taleb’s latest book is titled Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder. He advocates that we need to move towards systems that thrive in chaos. It seems to me that your post intersects with his thoughts.

  9. Bryan S. says:

    At the time this was written, Kansas City’s streetcar was in it’s early stages. Now they’re trying to expand it before the two mile starter line has even started running. Meanwhile, Seattle, Philadelphia, and Cincinnati are trying to cancel/cut back their streetcar routes.

    The most important thing to note is how many roads KC has and how easy it is to park here. Using those excess roads/parking for DEDICATED public transit lanes and making the bus better should be our strategy. With so much area to cover, it will be 50+ years before any rail system will ever be able to impact the city, and let’s face it, a streetcar is just a really expensive electric bus. We should be investing transit dollars in expanding the bus to other regions of the city and reducing transit times for riders in order to make it a viable option for commuting rather than just a casual stroll to the bar (where the bus was already going anyway.)

  10. Jon W. says:

    I’m obviously coming to this very late, but I do think this region (say, Omaha to Joplin) has *always* had a very different “distance between nodes” concept than other places. Yes, we had some run-on urban areas before cars, but we also had little pockets of urbanity connected by rail. OP was a rail suburb. St. Joseph/Leavenworth/KC is really more of an economic unit, formerly connected by water and rail. Lee’s Summit and Independence were connected by rail. Excelsior Springs seems “out there” today, but it used to be part of Kansas City’s social scene. This spread-out nature of Kansas City pre-dates cars.

    Traveling for the holidays, I am reminded that Joplin/Pittsburg/Nevada/Girard once operated as a more-or-less connected region, with many little towns connected by trolley or streetcar. This map of the system in 1913 is fascinating: There was a ton of rail, between very distant places.

    All of which is to say, the “theory” of pre-car Breadbasket needs to be adjusted. Yes, there was a huge street car network, but this region has always connected small, urban areas. My neighborhood in downtown Lee’s Summit is perfectly walkable, but the next closest area like that is Blue Springs, Raytown, or Independence. Even at our most urban, people around here like lots of open space in between nodes.

  11. Kevin Klinkenberg says:

    Jon – What you describe is accurate. But, it’s really no different than most of the rest of the country, or the world for that matter. Small bits of urbanity, linked together by rail networks or pre-rail transportation modes. We used to just call those towns, villages or cities. The space between was farms or wilderness. The settlement pattern was really no different than in New England or anywhere else, we just had more land and a lot fewer people to accommodate. And in the streetcar era, KCMO was a far, far more dense place than it is today. The 1950 population was essentially the same as today, in 1/4 the land area.
    Now, you could say those 1947 city limits represent a very large area compared to say, St. Louis or Boston or Philadelphia, and I’d generally agree (without doing the fact-checking). After all, the predominant building types in KC are detached walk-up buildings, as opposed to party-wall buildings in cities farther east. But there’s simply no denying that it once was a region of fairly compact places built around walking, biking and rail. If the pattern had been allowed to continue w/o the intervention of highways there’s little reason to believe the city wouldn’t have become more like Chicago than otherwise.

    PS – great map.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.